Tendering
Tender pack auto-assembled, vendor pre-qualification automated, bid comparison with historical-rate context.
Tendering compresses what is currently a 3-week manual process. Tender pack assembly (drawings + BOQ + GCC + SCC + tech spec) is generated from the project record. Vendor pre-qualification filters empanelled vendors by package, capacity, region — and Vendor 360 flags auto-exclude flagged vendors. Bid comparison enriches each line item with historical rates from prior projects, vendor history, and budget allocation. Award decisions are stamped with reasoning.
- ·BOQ finalised in M10
- ·Package scope confirmed by CPT and DCO
- ·Pre-qualified vendor list filtered against Vendor 360
- ·Tender release scheduled
- ·Bid responses received from invited vendors
- ·Award recommendation from CPT
- ·BOQ from M10 (version-locked)
- ·Spec package from M09
- ·Drawing version from M07
- ·Vendor 360 from M13 with current flags, capacity, performance
- ·Rate library and historical award rates from Bandhoo
- ·Budget allocation from M11
- ·GCC (General Conditions of Contract) template
- ·SCC (Special Conditions of Contract) per package
- ·Technical specification documents
- ·Vendor bid submissions
- ·Auto-assembly of tender pack from project record
- ·Pre-qualification filter applied against Vendor 360
- ·Auto-exclusion of flagged vendors
- ·Bid comparison enriched with historical rates from prior projects
- ·Side-by-side techno-commercial analysis
- ·Award reasoning captured as structured data
- ·tendering policy by package type
- ·Pre-qualification criteria per discipline
- ·Award approval policy with thresholds for CPT Head, Director, MD
- ·GCC and SCC policy templates
- ·Tender pack assembled from current versions of drawings, BOQ, spec
- ·Pre-qualification filter auto-excludes Vendor 360 flagged vendors
- ·Award above threshold requires CPT Head plus Finance approval
- ·Award above major threshold requires MD approval
- ·WO issuance requires e-acceptance from vendor before activation
- ·Tender pack (versioned, with all referenced artefacts)
- ·Pre-qualified vendor list per tender
- ·Bid submission record per vendor
- ·Comparison matrix with historical-rate context
- ·Award decision log with reasoning
- ·Work order with vendor e-acceptance
- ·Tender status updated through lifecycle
- ·Award commitment recorded against budget
- ·Vendor engagement updated in Vendor 360
- ·WO created in SAP and Bandhoo
- ·WO release triggers material flow in M17 and schedule update in M16
- ·WO release triggers WIR workflow setup in M19
- ·Award decision feeds budget commitment in M11
- ·Engagement update feeds Vendor 360 capacity tracking in M13
- CPTOwns tendering process end to end
- DCOBOQ source, rate validation
- DesignDrawing and spec inputs to tender pack
- CPT Head · FinanceAward decision
- 01Tender package preparation — drawings, BOQ, GCC, SCC, tech spec
- 02Vendor pre-qualification filter
- 03Tender release through Bandhoo
- 04Bid collection and structured comparison
- 05Technical and commercial analysis with historical-rate intelligence
- 06Work order release with reasoning logged
- 07E-acceptance by vendor
Tender assembly takes 2–3 weeks; bid comparison is spreadsheet-driven; context missing.
Tender pack assembled in hours; comparison shows historical context; decisions auditable.
Worli façade package tender — pack assembled from project record in 2 hours. 8 pre-qualified vendors invited; Sterling auto-excluded per Vendor 360 flag. Bids received within 14 days. Aluplex bid 4% below typical rate, flagged for technical review. WO awarded to Reliable Façade on 12 May at ₹38.4 Cr; e-acceptance received 14 May.
- ·Tender pack (versioned)
- ·Pre-qualified vendor list
- ·Bid submissions
- ·Comparison matrix with historical context
- ·Award decision log
- ·Work order
- ·E-acceptance record
Tender pack assembly takes 2-3 weeks. Bid comparison is a spreadsheet exercise. Historical-rate context is not available at award time. WO release cycle is long.