Gargi
AtlasStage 4 · ProcurementM14 · Tendering
M14extend

Tendering

Tender pack auto-assembled, vendor pre-qualification automated, bid comparison with historical-rate context.

What it is

Tendering compresses what is currently a 3-week manual process. Tender pack assembly (drawings + BOQ + GCC + SCC + tech spec) is generated from the project record. Vendor pre-qualification filters empanelled vendors by package, capacity, region — and Vendor 360 flags auto-exclude flagged vendors. Bid comparison enriches each line item with historical rates from prior projects, vendor history, and budget allocation. Award decisions are stamped with reasoning.

Inputs
Triggers
  • ·BOQ finalised in M10
  • ·Package scope confirmed by CPT and DCO
  • ·Pre-qualified vendor list filtered against Vendor 360
  • ·Tender release scheduled
  • ·Bid responses received from invited vendors
  • ·Award recommendation from CPT
Data reads
  • ·BOQ from M10 (version-locked)
  • ·Spec package from M09
  • ·Drawing version from M07
  • ·Vendor 360 from M13 with current flags, capacity, performance
  • ·Rate library and historical award rates from Bandhoo
  • ·Budget allocation from M11
Artefacts consumed
  • ·GCC (General Conditions of Contract) template
  • ·SCC (Special Conditions of Contract) per package
  • ·Technical specification documents
  • ·Vendor bid submissions
Tools & Techniques
Methods
  • ·Auto-assembly of tender pack from project record
  • ·Pre-qualification filter applied against Vendor 360
  • ·Auto-exclusion of flagged vendors
  • ·Bid comparison enriched with historical rates from prior projects
  • ·Side-by-side techno-commercial analysis
  • ·Award reasoning captured as structured data
Policies
  • ·tendering policy by package type
  • ·Pre-qualification criteria per discipline
  • ·Award approval policy with thresholds for CPT Head, Director, MD
  • ·GCC and SCC policy templates
Decision rules
  • ·Tender pack assembled from current versions of drawings, BOQ, spec
  • ·Pre-qualification filter auto-excludes Vendor 360 flagged vendors
  • ·Award above threshold requires CPT Head plus Finance approval
  • ·Award above major threshold requires MD approval
  • ·WO issuance requires e-acceptance from vendor before activation
Outputs
Artefacts produced
  • ·Tender pack (versioned, with all referenced artefacts)
  • ·Pre-qualified vendor list per tender
  • ·Bid submission record per vendor
  • ·Comparison matrix with historical-rate context
  • ·Award decision log with reasoning
  • ·Work order with vendor e-acceptance
Data writes
  • ·Tender status updated through lifecycle
  • ·Award commitment recorded against budget
  • ·Vendor engagement updated in Vendor 360
  • ·WO created in SAP and Bandhoo
Downstream triggers
  • ·WO release triggers material flow in M17 and schedule update in M16
  • ·WO release triggers WIR workflow setup in M19
  • ·Award decision feeds budget commitment in M11
  • ·Engagement update feeds Vendor 360 capacity tracking in M13
Stakeholders
  • CPTOwns tendering process end to end
  • DCOBOQ source, rate validation
  • DesignDrawing and spec inputs to tender pack
  • CPT Head · FinanceAward decision
The flow
  1. 01Tender package preparation — drawings, BOQ, GCC, SCC, tech spec
  2. 02Vendor pre-qualification filter
  3. 03Tender release through Bandhoo
  4. 04Bid collection and structured comparison
  5. 05Technical and commercial analysis with historical-rate intelligence
  6. 06Work order release with reasoning logged
  7. 07E-acceptance by vendor
State change
Before

Tender assembly takes 2–3 weeks; bid comparison is spreadsheet-driven; context missing.

After

Tender pack assembled in hours; comparison shows historical context; decisions auditable.

Real-world example

Worli façade package tender — pack assembled from project record in 2 hours. 8 pre-qualified vendors invited; Sterling auto-excluded per Vendor 360 flag. Bids received within 14 days. Aluplex bid 4% below typical rate, flagged for technical review. WO awarded to Reliable Façade on 12 May at ₹38.4 Cr; e-acceptance received 14 May.

Artefacts
  • ·Tender pack (versioned)
  • ·Pre-qualified vendor list
  • ·Bid submissions
  • ·Comparison matrix with historical context
  • ·Award decision log
  • ·Work order
  • ·E-acceptance record
Pain today

Tender pack assembly takes 2-3 weeks. Bid comparison is a spreadsheet exercise. Historical-rate context is not available at award time. WO release cycle is long.

Integrations
Bandhoo